We have individual thread topics for main cover stories and feature articles, so this thread is for those smaller news articles and blurbs you find in different publications.
Oz sent me this review a few days ago from the Star Tribune, and it really made me mad when I read it. I've been trying to write a response to the writer without getting nasty (lol), but there's so many things about it that rub me the wrong way.
What's odd is that the article entitled
TV's magnificent misfits come out this month, starts off rather positively by stating that the riskier, more interesting shows are debuting in January, while September (filled with massive new fall programming) gives us more boring fare. He writes, "Naturally, they end up creating a tantalazing month of strange and often wonderful shows"..."Here are 10 shows -- some new, some starting new seasons -- to look for:"
So he's setting us up for some interesting shows with good reviews, right? He then goes on to rate these shows, giving
The L Word only 2 stars, while
Sex In the City gets 3 stars and
The Surreal Life gets 3 1/2 stars!
The L Word was rated lowest out of the 10 shows and compared rather harshly to
Queer As Folk.
QUOTE
"The L Word": Showtime's new drama, which centers on the lives of Los Angeles lesbians, is the ideal companion piece to "Queer as Folk" -- and that's not a compliment. Both series are too interested in hot 'n' heavy make-out scenes and generous amounts of nudity. While that's fine if you want erotica, it's a poor excuse for drama. I counted eight sex scenes in the first two-hour episode, featuring the likes of Jennifer Beals and Mia Kirshner. I'm sure they'll be popular on the Internet, but I wouldn't look for them at the Emmys. Premieres 9 p.m. Jan. 18, Showtime. **
First of all, he's trashing what was a ground-breaking show (some may argue) for the gay community,
Queer As Folk. Then he says that L Word is made up of gratuitous nudity, equating it to
erotica, and says it doesn't qualify as "dramatic" programming. I'm certain that Ilene Chaiken and Rose Troche would have a few comebacks for those remarks. No one involved with The L Word has set out to make
erotica. They are highly dedicated professionals intent on creating good dramatic and comedic programming. And what exactly does he mean by "the likes of Jennifer Beals and Mia Kirshner??" Is that supposed to be insulting?? To me, it feels like Mr. Justin (the tv critic and trends editor) is offended by homosexual programming. Does he not remember any make-out scenes in
SEX in the City?! Give me a break.
~Slicey